| Vol. 18 No. 1 September 2003 Summer Catch-UpWhile you were away at the      beach or...
 Affirmative Action AffirmedIN THE FINAL SESSION of its season,      the U.S. Supreme Court rendered its long-awaited opinion of the      use of race in college and professional school admissions. The      June 23 ruling was a split decision for the University of Michigan,      the defendant in the case, but an important victory for affirmative      action.
 Yes, race may be used as a plus factor in the admissions calculation,      as is done at the University of Michigan's Law School, the court      said. No, Michigan's undergraduate admission system of affixing      points to such a calculation is not permitted. It had been a quarter century since the Supreme Court ruled      so decisively on the issue of race and admissions, and the effect      of this decision is more than likely to last another two-and-a-half      decades. "In order to cultivate a set of leaders," said Justice      Sandra Day O'Connor, "with legitimacy in the eyes of the      citizenry, it is necessary that the path to leadership be visibly      open to talented and qualified individuals of every race and      ethnicity." Dissenting Justice Clarence Thomas retorted, "The majority      upholds the Law School's racial discrimination not by interpreting      the people's Constitution, but by responding to a faddish slogan      of the cognoscenti." HARVARD'S RESPONSESeveral universities, including Ohio State and the      University of Massachusetts, are reformulating their admission      policies because they were similar to the mathematical model      used by Michigan's undergraduate admissions.
 However, Justice O'Connor cited Harvard's admissions plan      as a model in her swing opinion. And Harvard and other elite      institutions responded that the ruling reaffirmed their practices,      which would remain unchanged. According to the July 17 issue of the Harvard University      Gazette, Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers said that,      "the court's pivotal opinion embraces the core principles      that have long informed Harvard's approach to admissions."      He added, "And it confirms that universities are entitled      to substantial deference on matters at the heart of their academic      mission, such as selection of their students." Summers concluded, "Perhaps most important, the court      explicitly upholds the rights of universities to pursue student      diversity through carefully designed admissions programs that      flexibly consider each applicant as an individual and that properly      treat race as one among a broad array of factors that may be      taken into account. We all share a vital stake in the education      of citizens and leaders for a diverse society." OPPONENTS NEXT MOVEA victory for affirmative action in the courts may      only push the action elsewhere. Ward Connerly, who successfully      led ballot initiatives against affirmative action in California      and Washington, is launching similar campaigns in Michigan and      probably two other states, possibly Arizona, Colorado, Missouri,      Oregon or Utah, for the 2004 election. He needs to sign up 320,000      Michigan voters to get on the ballot, and that could cost more      than half a million dollars. Both Republican and Democratic political      leaders in Michigan said they will oppose his voter initiatives.
 Meanwhile, Colorado Governor Bill Owens and Republican legislative      leaders are introducing legislation to prohibit using race as      an admissions factor in their state schools. Other college observers note that the affirmative action controversy      never really applies to most colleges and universities where      competition for admission is not as fierce as at elite schools.[back      to top]
 OTHER SUMMER ACTIONDoes Class Matter More Than Race? Discrimination by economic      status, not race, is the greatest problem in college admissions,      wrote Peter Sacks in the July 25 Chronicle of Higher Education.      Sacks charged that "At America's selective institutions,      class rules." He cited the fact that in 1995, at 146 of      the nation's most competitive colleges, just 3 percent of admitted      students came from "families of modest social and economic      backgrounds."
 Sacks, author of The High Price of America's Testing Culture      and What We Can Do to Change It (Perseus Publishing, 1999),      noted that in 1999, 80 percent of the fathers of white freshmen      at 28 highly selective colleges had B.A. degrees and professional      jobs. And 80 percent of the Asian students at those colleges,      66 percent of the Latino students and 60 percent of the black      students were not first-generation college students. Standardized      testing is one of the main barriers that keeps American colleges      economically stratified, Sacks believes. Pell Grant Funding Frozen. Facing deep federal deficits,      Congress decided not to increase funding for Pell Grants this      year. Maximum Pell Grants remain at $4,050, slightly above President      Bush's recommended cut to $4,000 a year, beginning in October. Other federal aid programs such as Gear Up and TRIO will receive      small increases. The Supplemental Opportunity Grant Program,      the Federal Work Study Program, the Perkins Loan Program and      the Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnership Program will      all be funded at current levels. Pell Cuts. Last spring, the Department of Education      reformulated the eligibility requirements for Pell Grants. As      a result, an estimated 84,000 students could lose their grants      for the 2004-05 school year. The Pell program will save $270      million. "It doesn't stop there," Brian K. Fitzgerald, director      of the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance, which      advises Congress, told The New York Times last month.      "It will have a ripple effect through all the other financial      aid programs such as state grants, loans and institutional dollars." The Department of Education counters that despite the tightening      of requirements, the increase in the number of higher education      students will mean that as many as 300,000 students will receive      Pell Grants in 2004. NCAA Reduces SAT/ACT Importance. The National Collegiate      Athletic Association (NCAA) has scuttled its single minimum test      score cut-off for first-year college athletes. The old system,      which began as Proposition 48 and set an 820 SAT sports participation      cut-off level, has been replaced by a sliding scale that allows      strong high school class performance to offset low standardized      test scores. For years, some civil rights organizations, minority coaches      and teachers, and FairTest, an organization dedicated to ending      over-reliance on standardized tests, fought Prop 48, saying it      was biased and unfair. Last year, a U.S. District Court judged      agreed, ruling that "the racially adverse impact caused      by the SAT cutoff score is not justified by any legitimate educational      necessity." Under the new NCAA freshman system, a high school athlete      with a core course GPA of 3.55 or higher could score as low as      400 on the combined SAT verbal and math tests. However, a high      school student athlete with a 2.0 GPA would be required to score      at least a 1010 on the combined SAT in order to play his or her      freshman year of college. NCAA president Myles Brand told The Washington Post,      "I know from being president of Indiana University thatthe      single most important predictor of success in college is high      school performance in academic core courses. That's what's going      to tell us whether they graduate or not." The Real Cost of Athletics. And a just released NCAA      study of college athletic spending concludes that, contrary to      popular opinion, almost every college athletic program loses      money. The typical university or college spends about 3.5 percent      of the institution's budget on athletics. At the same time, colleges that spend more money in hopes      of creating winning teams or generating greater revenues do not      achieve their goals. Nor does more or less athletic spending      increase or decrease academic success among an institution's      athletes.[back      to top]
 Fall's AgendaTrends in the year ahead
 Three-Year High Schools Open
 COLLEGES HAVE BEEN PUSHING their admissions      process fast forward with early admissions programs, so is the      fourth year of high school really necessary?
 This summer, the Florida legislature passed, and Governor      Jeb Bush signed, a new law requiring all Florida high schools      to create an 18-credit, three-year high school track that concentrates      on the core classes while eliminating "extras" such      as physical education, electives and art. The new option should be available at most Florida high schools      this fall and will help alleviate school overcrowding. To graduate,      students will still need a 2.0 grade point average and to pass      the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test. WASTED TIME?"There are too many high school seniors walking      around taking two study halls and three lunch periods because      they collected all their required course work and GPA before      their senior year even began," Florida Atlantic University      president Frank Brogan told the Miami Herald.
 Yet others fear that some students may not be socially ready      to leave high school, forced prematurely into the work world      or miss out on the crowning experience of high school including      athletics or leadership experiences. The state's teachers union      also opposes the change, in part, because it may lead to loss      of teaching jobs and because it could deplete the elective, vocational      and fine arts programs. UNCERTAIN COLLEGE IMPACTWhile Florida's 11 public universities will recognize      the change, selective private colleges and out-of-state institutions      may not be as sympathetic. But that could change if other states      take up the idea. Then the early phenomena will have real impact.
 HIGHER ED ACT REAUTHORIZATION      FIGHT LIKELYCongressional hearings have already begun for next      year's reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, and observers      are predicting fireworks. Indeed, instead of simply tinkering      with the old Higher Education Act as has been the practice during      other reauthorizations, many colleges are bracing for heavy criticism.
 The Chronicle of Higher Education reported July 11      that the Bush Administration is gearing up to expand its "No      Child Left Behind" education reform agenda to include colleges      and universities as part of its reelection strategy. The Bush administration is likely to attack the relentless      rise in college tuition costs which its says threatens to put      college out of reach for low-and middle-income students; demand      more accountability from colleges for outcomes; and insist that      colleges do much more to retain and graduate students, especially      low-income students, of whom an estimated 80 percent drop out      before graduation. Only about 50 percent of all students who      enter college graduate within five years. ORIGINAL INTENTOriginally introduced by President Lyndon B. Johnson      in 1965, the Higher Education Act is designed to increase college      access for low-income students. Educational Opportunity Grants      for low-income students were introduced in 1968, as was the guaranteed-student      loan program to assist middle-class students. HEA has made college      available to millions of low- and middle-income students since      its original passage.
 HEA's first reauthorization in 1968 added the TRIO program.      The act was again reauthorized in 1972, with the addition of      what are now called Pell Grants. In 1993, Congress voted to replace      60 percent of the guaranteed loan program with direct lending      and gave students up to 25 years to repay loans. In 1998, Congress halted the formula for conversion to direct      loans. HEA is reauthorized every six years. New programs are      added from time to time, and new levels of grant and loan authorizations      are set by Congress. The actually funding of those programs is      part of the annual budget process, and often the amount budgeted      does not reach maximum reauthorization levels. OUTLOOK: NO HELP FOR STUDENT      AIDEarly indications are that next year's reauthorization      and budget will add very little money to federal student aid      programs. With huge budget deficits of $450 billion this year      and $475 billion next year hanging over them, lawmakers will      have little room for new initiatives. CB will keep you updated      on the HEA reauthorization process.
 [back      to top]
 THE COUNSELOR'S CORNER
  The Essay: Issues of Access THE COLLEGE ADMISSION PROCESS is meant to draw from all aspects of the population of young      people in this country, carrying them into the wider world of      academia and ultimately to satisfying work thereafter. It's a      fairly complex process of selection and consideration on both      sides.
 And tucked away in the middle of it all is the application      essay, a tricky bit that challenges some applicants and makes      the process substantially different for others. The application essay is an opportunity for students to introduce      themselves and their lives to the college, to present a single      recommending trait or feature from their years of existence.      "What can I show about myself in this essay?" is the      critical question. And it is an opportunity for young writers      to demonstrate mastery of a genre, the expository essay. But      not all applicants maximize these opportunities. HOW DO COLLEGES USE ESSAYS?Since 1984, I've been asking students, school counselors      and admissions officers at a broad range of high schools and      colleges about application essays, how they get written and how      they get read. Of course, not all colleges require an essay (although      the 146 schools that accept the Common Application do), but it      seemed worthwhile to determine how colleges evaluate this piece      of student writing and what process the writers themselves go      through in its creation.
 In a 1998 survey, where the average number of applications      read by the responding colleges was 4,600, I found that the average      time an admission counselor spent reading an application was      17.8 minutes-with five minutes, on average, given to the essay.      That's not a lot of time. Conversely, admission counselors estimated the time students      spent writing these essays was about four hours. Students reported      more like nine hours busy at their desks. There's a disconnect      here. It's important for students to know how quickly their essays      are evaluated but it is also important for admission personnel      to know how hard students work on this assignment. More information about the importance of essays showed that      both students and admission officers ranked the essay as the      fourth most important component in the admission process. Overall,      however, students tended to think the essay was more important      than did the admissions officers. Another disconnect, but not      necessarily a bad one. Essays, in general, may be only "somewhat      important," and yet for a specific, individual application,      an essay can become the "tip factor" that makes the      decision among a group of similarly-qualified students. There was some agreement: admissions officers and students      both said that the top four criteria for an essay are correctness,      organization, specific details and an individual or distinctive      style. Students don't need to write amazing dialogue, choose      a topic of international interest or break the reader's heart.      They need correct, organized and specific essays that make clear      who they are.[back      to top]
 HOW DO STUDENTS WRITE APPLICATION      ESSAYS?As mentioned, students appear to take the essay seriously      and often give many hours to its creation.
 And in most cases, they are wise enough to seek a little guidance      or help. In both large urban high schools and smaller, more affluent      suburban high schools, students turned to parents, friends and      teachers for help with essays. In schools with extensive counseling      available to them, 70 percent of seniors sought help from a parent,      60 percent from an English teacher, 58 percent from a school      counselor and 51 percent from a friend (clearly, most students      went to several sources of help). But among the students in large      urban schools, only 32 percent said a parent helped, and only      28 percent went to an English teacher. The school counselors      were even less significant advisors, outranked by the student's      own friends. And although in general parental involvement was      very significant, among students of color, first generation college      students or those with parents for whom English was not their      first language, this was less true. In like manner, students in schools where only about 60 percent      of the students went on to postsecondary education were more      likely to wait until the day before the essay was due to put      pen to paperand this was slightly more likely to happen with      boys. Also, 25 percent of these students dropped an application      because of the presence of an essay. I came to think of these      students as "under-counseled." They were already in      high schools with high student to advisor ratios. And they clearly      were getting less of the "extracurricular" advisement      that teachers, coaches and parents are providing in other settings.      Disadvantaged students are further disadvantaged in the application      essay process. What's too much help? Professional writers frequently kick      their ideas around with somebody else. The amount of assistance      a student goes after can and should be what would be available      to that student in the institutions they are going to be attending.      The idea that students should lock themselves in their rooms,      write four pages that can affect their future lives and slam      it in an envelope is ill-advised. In fact, in college itself,      their success will in part depend on their ability to co-opt      assistance and draw people into their educational process. So      some hands-off help is appropriate and all students should ask      for and be offered this kind of help. RECOMMENDATIONS1. Since essays matter at every type of college for      a variety of reasons and uses, high schools can signal the importance      of essays with programmatic support. High-income settings do      that. But in schools where students aren't getting enough help,      large group workshops, a half-day drop-in opportunity with English      teachers or planned conversations in English or history classrooms      would raise awareness and get kids started.
 2. Since English teachers serve a significant role in assisting      students, they should be noticed for that. Admissions personnel      should talk with English teachers about the role they play, invite      them to college admission offices or meet with them when visiting      a high school to answer questions. English teachers need to feel      noticed, dignified and well-informed about this "extracurricular"      work. 3. Parents should be viewed as an essential part of the essay      process. Parents, no matter their education, can be wonderfully      helpful in talking with their senior about life experience, strengths      (forget the weaknesses), and plans. Counselors should guide parents      into the process and show them how to be useful and informed      collaborators. Sarah Myers McGinty is a university      supervisor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and a      private educational consultant with the McGinty Consulting Group      in Boston. This article was adapted with permission from a speech      given at the 2002 National Association for College Admission      Counseling conference in Salt Lake City, Utah.[back      to top]
 TUITION      TABSCalifornia Tuition Crisis. Deep in red ink to the tune of $38 billion, California's legislature      is slashing millions from its higher education budget. As a result,      state universities have hiked tuition by as much as 30 percent      this fall. The University of California system lost $360 million      in state funds. Tuition at those schools rose by 25 percent to      $4,794 for in-state students. But with the state budget still      unresolved, the board of regents also authorized a further 5      percent increase if the cuts go deeper, possibly pushing tuition      up to $5,400 a year for in-staters.
 The California State University system of 23 campuses boosted      tuition from $1,572 to $2,044 for in-state undergrads and from      $1,734 to $2,254 for in-state graduate students. Financial aid      for students from families with incomes below $60,000 will increase. Illinois Tuition Freeze. Making good on his election promise to do something about escalating      tuition, Governor Rod R. Blagojevich recently signed a new "Truth      in Tuition" law that will freeze tuition for students at      the state's public colleges and universities at the level set      when they enter as freshmen. The freeze is good for four years      for most undergraduates and five years for programs that are      designed for five years. The law takes effect in the 2004-2005      academic year. Gov. Blagojevich and state lawmakers were responding to voter      frustrations over a decade in which tuition doubled. Tuition      this year at the U. of I. has gone up another 5 percent to $5,568      for in-state students. "The dream of a college education is something we must      encourage, not discourage," the governor said. However,      the new law may force universities to introduce large tuition      increases before students matriculate. Still, parents will know      for certain what they are facing from the start. A 7 Percent Solution. Case      Western Reserve University increased tuition by 7.1 percent,      increasing the sticker price for undergraduates from $21,000      to $22,500. Room and board rates are increasing between 7.8 to      8.6 percent, depending upon the kind of room and its location.      However, CWRU claims it is still "one of the best values      in the country" and its value is rated 21st among national      research universities by U.S. World & News Report.      CWRU students received $58 million in scholarships, grants, loans      and employment assistance in 2003. That amounts to $19,393 per      student receiving aid. The Pace Guarantee. Pace      University in New York City is making a bargain with its students.      The school promises to freeze tuition at whatever level a student      pays during the first year of attendance, for the next five years.      That is, it will remain stable after one more increase of 15      percent this academic year. The rate for the school's 9,000 undergrads      will increase from $17,800 to $20,500. Current students will      face smaller increases, which will also be frozen for them. Other      schools, such as Western Illinois University, have similar plans. Harvard Hits $37,928. Harvard's      2003-2004 undergraduate tuition, fees and room and board hit      $37,928, an increase of 5.5 percent. Two-thirds of Harvard's      undergraduates receive financial aid, averaging $27,050. Aid      has expanded by 37 percent over the past five years. The average      debt of Harvard grads has dropped by $4,000 over the past five      years, to $10,450 per student. "Harvard College is built upon the twin principles of      need-blind admissions and need-based financial aid," William      C. Kirby, dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, reaffirmed. Florida Cuts. Public colleges      lost $40 million in this year's state budget and things could      get worse next year. As a result, tuition will rise by 8.5 percent      for in-state students and as much as 15 percent for out-of-state      and graduate students. Tuition for Florida's community colleges      is going up by 7.5 percent. In 2002-3, Florida's average public      tuition was just $2,700 compared to $4,100 nationwide.[back      to top]
 NEWS YOU      CAN USEThe Dartmouth Class of      2007. Eighteen percent or 2,155 applicants were admitted      to Dartmouth this year, drawn from the largest applicant pool      in Dartmouth's history: 11,855.
 According to Roland Adams, director of news and public information,      it is also the most diverse in the institution's 234 years: 33      percent of the members of the incoming class are students of      color; 6 percent are international students and there are more      women (545) than men (535). It is also one of the strongest first-year classes to enter      any institution in the country, according to Adams. The SAT Medians:      710 verbal, 720 math. Nearly 24 percent were high school valedictorians,      10 percent salutatorians; 84 percent ranked in the top 10 percent      of their class. About 62 percent of the class are from public      schools; 32 percent from private schools; and 6 percent from      parochial schools. All admissions were on a need-blind basis;      46 percent will receive scholarship assistance. Harvard's 2003 Yield. Nearly      80 percent of students admitted to Harvard College for the Class      of 2007 are enrolling, according to the Harvard University      Gazette. As a result, few students were admitted from Harvard's      Wait List. Harvard's record yield was even with last year, and      reached the historic levels of the late 1970s, despite the fact      that its Early Action program allows admitted student to enroll      in other colleges. The percentage of students admitted this year      was the lowest in the school's history, just 9.8 percent. Director of Admissions Maryln McGrath Lewis said, "Throughout      the United States and around the world, alumni and alumnae made      an enormous difference in recruiting the Class of 2007 by visiting      high schools, arranging visits to high schools for admissions      officers, interviewing candidates, calling admitted students      and hosting local gatherings in April for admitted students and      their parents." Trade Secrets. Where do      college professors from the Northeast send their children to      college? According to two Vanderbilt economists, Malcolm Getz      and John J. Siegfried, who studied the trends for a decade: Oberlin,      Carleton, Stanford, Duke, U. of Michigan, U. of Chicago, U. of      California at Berkeley, Reed, Northwestern U. and C. of William      and Mary. Others included: Colorado, Vanderbilt, Washington U. at St.      Louis, Pomona, Brigham Young, Kenyon, Richmond, U. of Wisconsin-Madison,      Virginia Tech., Georgetown, George Washington and Macalester. Gifts to Higher Ed Dip. The      recession has been deep, but charitable gifting to higher education      funds fell only a little more than 1 percent (2.6 percent when      adjusted for inflation) last year to a still hefty $31.64 billion      in 2002. Education receives about 13 percent of all donations,      the leading category for giving. Private Loans Soar. According      to a report released in July by the Institute for Higher Education      Policy, private borrowing by college students has increased 346      percent since 1995-96, and has reached$5 billion a year!
 [back      to top]
  
       
 COLLEGE BOUND's Publisher/Editor: R. Craig      Sautter, DePaul University; Chief Operating Officer: Sally      Reed; Contributor: Marc Davis; Circulation: Irma      Gonzalez-Hider; Illustration: Louis Coronel; Board      of Advisors: Rosita Fernandez-Rojo, Choate-Rosemary Hall; Claire D. Friedlander, Bedford (N.Y.) Central School District; Howard Greene, author, The Greenes' Guides to Educational      Planning Series; Frank C. Leana, Ph.D., educational      counselor; Virginia Vogel, Educational Guidance Services; M. Fredric Volkmann, Washington University in St. Louis, Mary Ann Willis, Bayside Academy (Daphne, Ala.).
 
 
 
           |