mast 

 

 
 

Vol. 22 No. 3 November 2007

The News from NACAC This Fall
IN AUSTIN, TEXAS, this fall, the National Association of College Admissions Counseling celebrated its 70th anniversary at its 63rd annual meeting. Over 4,500 guidance counselors and admissions officers attended 120 workshops on a variety of topics in college admissions and financial aid.

Technology's impact on admissions was one hot topic. In its fifth annual "State of College Admission," NACAC said that the admissions process is becoming more mechanical at many institutions because of the increased use of technology.

And while students become more technologically savvy, admissions officers are being pushed to keep up with the volume of work. The report noted that the mean ratio of applications to admission officers at public universities was 741 to 1, at private colleges 279 to 1.

Meanwhile, NACAC found that about 33 percent of inquiries to four-year colleges were received by email or the school's web, and 58 percent of applications now come in online. Colleges are also using technology to reach students. Some 47 percent send email newsletters to prospective students, 35 percent provide online chat rooms and 29 percent maintain Web logs, 27 percent notify students of their decision by email and 25 percent let students check their status online.

Half of all high schools have a computer station or resource center exclusively dedicated to the college search.

COMMERCIALIZATION HURTING
The ill effects of commercialization on the admissions process was another hot topic. Lloyd Thacker and the Education Conservancy were on hand with a new study, "College Admissions: What Are Students Learning?" to charge that "Admissions has distorted the way education is perceived and pursued between students, parents, families, high schools and colleges." However, there are some positives Thacker sees in the process. "We found out that (students) are learning good things: how to think about themselves, how to communicate about themselves and how to plan for the future."

But there are some distinct negatives. "Their level of cynicism about higher education is not something that educators would respectively want, and it's a result of the practices and signals that they are learning."

SAT ATTACK
One popular session at the conference was chaired by William R. Fitzsimmons, Harvard's dean of admissions and financial aid. It drew more than 100 high school counselors and college admissions officers. On a voice vote, the group strongly urged making the SAT optional. "I think the negatives far outweigh the positives," Brad MacGowan, a counselor at Newton North High School in Massachusetts told Education Week. There is speculation that NACAC may formally adopt a similar position.

According to the National Center for Fair & Open Testing, 755 colleges and universities do not require test scores from most of their applicants. However, the College Board claims that 88 percent of four-year colleges rely on the test.

Many of the NACAC participants thought the former SAT II or subject tests are more useful and reliable. A very small number of colleges now require these subject tests, according to Fitzsimmons, who said he feels "a lot of places really, really need" standardized tests. In part, they help sort real skills in an era of grade inflation.

NACAC has formed a Commission On the Use of Standardized Tests in Undergraduate Admission chaired by Mr. Fitzsimmons and will issue a report next year. For more about the conference and to order tapes of the individual sessions, see www.nacacnet.org.

[back to top]

The Federal Dollar
New Student Aid Law. Last month, President Bush signed a budget reconciliation law, the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007, authorizing what was called the largest increase in student aid since the G.I Bill. As a result of cutting government subsidies to student-loan companies for the second time in two years, money was freed to increase the maximum Pell Grant from $4,310 to $5,400, increasing $400 a year until 2012-2013. The law also expands the minimum income cutoff for a maximum Pell Grant from $20,000 to $30,000. The income-contingent repayment option will be extended to those who use private loans.

Minority serving institutions also received an infusion of $255 million. Another $100 million was designated for institutions seeking to increase Hispanic enrollment in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM).

Student aid lenders took the brunt of the cuts, losing $21 billion in subsidies. For example, the amount of federally guaranteed reimbursement to lenders for loans that default will fall from 97 to 95 percent. The default rate recently fell to 4.6 percent. Some Republicans charged that instead of saving money, the bill will spend 29 times more than it saved, if calculations extend beyond five years.

FAFSA Won't Be Mailed. Beginning in January, paper copies of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) will no longer routinely be mailed out to schools by the U.S. Department of Education. Since 94 percent of students use the electronic version, the bulk mailing of millions of copies proved wasteful.

However, the DOE will send out specially- requested bulk copies to schools that request them because their students do not have sufficient access to the electronic version.

Federal Research Funds. Which colleges receive the most federal money for research? The top 15, in order: Johns Hopkins, U. of Washington, U. of Michigan, Stanford U., U. of Wisconsin at Madison, U. of California at Los Angeles, U. of Pennsylvania, MIT, U. of California at San Francisco, U. of California at San Diego, Columbia U., U. of Colorado, U. of Pittsburgh, Duke U. and Washington U. at St. Louis.

New Federal Funds. The federal Academic Competitiveness Grants were awarded for the first time last year to 400,000 first- and second-year Pell Grant recipients who received, on average, $850. SMART Grants of about $3,875 were also awarded for the first time to 80,000 third- and fourth-year Pell Grant recipients majoring in physical, life or computer science; engineering; mathematics; technology; or a specified foreign language.

Sallie Mae Sale Off. And one victim of the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007, recently signed by President Bush, is the $25 billion sale of Sallie Mae, the giant student loan company. Because the new law cut subsidies to lenders the deal was no longer attractive to a consortium of banks and private equity firms. The cancelled deal called for stock purchases of $60 a share. But after Congress acted, stocks have been selling in the $42 range.

[back to top]

The Guide to the Guides
Rankings, More Rankings. In case you missed the controversial U.S. News & World Report rankings, here are some highlights: "Best National Universities," in order: Princeton, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, California Institute of Technology, U. of Pennsylvania, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Duke, Columbia U., U. of Chicago, Dartmouth C., Cornell U., Washington U. in St. Louis, Brown, Johns Hopkins, Northwestern, Emory, Rice, Notre Dame, Vanderbilt, U. California-Berkeley, Carnegie Mellon, Georgetown, U. of Virginia, U. California-Los Angeles and U. of Michigan.

The "Best Liberal Arts Colleges," in order: Williams, Amherst, Swarthmore, Wellesley, Carleton, Middlebury, Bowdoin, Pomona, Davidson, Haverford, Claremont McKenna, Grinnell, Vassar, Wesleyan, Harvey Mudd, Washington and Lee, Colgate, Hamilton, Smith, Oberlin, U.S. Naval Academy, Colby, U.S. Military Academy, Bates and Bryn Mawr.

The top 10 "Best Black Colleges," in order: Spelman, Howard, Hampton, Morehouse, Fisk, Tuskegee, Claflin, Xavier of Louisiana, Dillard and Johnson C. Smith U.

America's Best Colleges. New this year in the 2008 edition of U.S. News and World Report: military service academies and the percentage of Pell Grant recipients attending a college are some of the variables used to calculate "graduation rate performance;" see www.usnews.com/colleges.

Barron's Guide to the Most Competitive Colleges, 5th edition; profiles 74 schools with quotes from former students and lists of prominent grads; 1,112 pages; published by (Barron's Educational Series, 2007); www.barronseduc.com; ISBN-13: 978-0-7641-3760-0, $21.99; www.barronseduc.com.

The Best 366 Colleges: This 2008 edition from The Princeton Review asked 120,000 college students "what their colleges are really like"; (where students have the "best classroom experience," for example. Answer: Reed C., Wabash C., Thomas Aquinas C., Wellesley C. and Mount Holyoke C.); 813 pages; ISBN: 978-0-375-76621-3; $21.95.

Southern Affairs. And if you are looking for almost any statistic about higher education in the South, you are likely to find it in the Southern Regional Education Board's Fact Book on Higher Education. One highlight: SREB forecasts that "population changes could put gains in education attainment at risk" as Hispanics-whose college-going rates lag behind those of blacks and whites-are expected to move into the South more than any other group in the next two decades.

Reports and databases with information on the number of students enrolled, their success rate, financial aid and more about colleges and universities in 16 states are packed into the 50th anniversary of the book at http://www.sreb.org/main/EdData/FactBook/summary2007.asp.

International Rankings. The Institute of Higher Education at Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China has released its Academic Ranking of World Universities 2007. While including a disclaimer that the rankings, by nature, have methodological and technical problems, it is an attempt to gather information about the leading 500 universities worldwide including descriptions of fields of study and alumni. The rankings can be viewed by looking at the top 100, for example, or by listings of the top universities in North and Latin America, Europe and the Asia Pacific areas.

The rankings are "done independently by the ranking team in IHE-SJTU for their academic interests without any external financial support." The sponsors note, "It has nothing to do with any commercial activities what so ever." With that said: the top 12: Harvard, Stanford, UC-Berkeley, Cambridge, MIT, California Institute of Technology, Columbia U., Princeton, U. of Chicago, Oxford, Yale and Cornell U.

[back to top]

THE COUNSELOR'S CORNER
Where Would Holden Cauldfield Get In?
EDITOR'S NOTE: Holden Caulfield, the protagonist in J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye, was once kicked out of a prep school in Pennsylvania. And one NACAC session this fall that drew a large crowd focused on strategies to help such underachieving boys today gain college admission. Two counselors, Greg McCandless, Sage Hill School in Newport Coast, California, and Annette Cleary, Marquette University High School in Milwaukee, made suggestions for both writing recommendations and working with "late blooming" males.

IS IT EASIER FOR BOYS TO BE ADMITTED TO SELECTIVE COLLEGES? The answer is clearly "No." Admissions professionals have a responsibility to their institution to bring in the best people possible, as demonstrated through grades, tests, match and essays that show they are worthy to be a member of the institution. So even if we have a gender shortage that doesn't mean unqualified males can just walk through the gate. No one wants to be the admissions person who admits someone who is ill equipped to do the work, and then, during first semester, have a professor come around asking, "So who admitted Joe?" And you have nothing to point to in the file as to why you did it.

Still, there is the growing problem of underachieving and unmotivated young men. How can counselors become effective advocates for these late bloomers so that they can, at least, get into a college or university that is realistically a good match for them?

RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Honesty is Required.
In writing recommendations, counselors can't pretend that a student's record is stellar and ignore the low grades or disciplinary problems. They can't pretend that the college application readers are not going to pick up on them. A favorite question readers ask is, "Why is no one talking about the 'D'?" A counselor's credibility as an advocate goes out the window if he or she does not address those holes in the record. The same goes for students. They lose credibility if they don't acknowledge problems somewhere in their application or essay. And they lose an opportunity to talk about what they have learned from what they have gone through.

2. Add a Perspective on the Student. Readers of recommendations want to get a sense from counselors about "the late bloomer." They want to know, "Is this low grade the result of laziness?" "Is it because of a lack of challenge?" "Are there home issues?" Offering a perspective on a student can tell colleges that when you sit across the desk from the student, "He is fantastic and his face lights up when he talks about math or creative writing. But boy, are those science classes a pain for him." Tell the college, "This is why this student is looking at your school. This is why this student is a match for your school."

Colleges do want as much disclosure as possible. But if a counselor and the student haven't taken the opportunity to write the student's story, the reader will make his or her own narrative and it probably won't be as favorable. But if both are enthusiastic and realistic at the same time, it gives readers something to use to advocate for that student.

3. Take Responsibility. It also helps to explain to students that they must take responsibility, either in an essay or an interview, for their own story. Yet, help them see how to portray their situation and explain the problems that led to the "D-" in their junior year. But they should also highlight the positives-the intellectual curiosity that drives them to read a book in English class all in one night even though it drives their teacher crazy because they are ahead of the rest of the class.

It is also important for colleges to know that the applicant is not a "toxic personality," and that that was not what caused the problems. If it was a discipline issue, was it a one time "teenaged boy" situation or is it a pattern of behavior? Boys, in particular, often get very nervous that one problem will define them forever. Tell them they have a choice: They can decide if this is one incident or a pattern that defines them in their high school career. A lot of boys respond to this. It helps them to stay positive. It can push them on to maturity.

4. Call and Follow up. A follow-up phone call is helpful. For example, a Holden Caulfield may be interested in just one area, so he is amazing in science and math, but cringes at the psychology course. Sometimes it is hard for colleges to reconcile that behavior. They will wonder, "How would that work out for our college and our core curriculum?" "How do we know that the young man will plug into that interest at the next level?"

5. Put the Curriculum in Context. Maybe this late bloomer didn't have great grades, but the student did push himself and tried to stretch. Or counselors can note that while maybe a student isn't that strong, he did take four years of social studies or an AP class or two. It is a fine balance between talking about the negatives, and framing them in a way that gives the college a broader understanding of the student in relation to the curriculum and the other students in the school.

6. Remember Ethical Issues are Involved. Counselors must remain true to who they are. They can only do so much. This is the student's record and life. Counselors shouldn't ever feel they have to cross the line in advocating for the student to make something happen that really isn't earned. Put the responsibility on students to advocate for themselves. (At the same time, colleges need to remember that counselors and schools are also worried about the legal ramifications of how honest they can be.)

7. Show Students How to Write about Their Experiences. If there have been incidents that have happened to students in the last couple of years, a disciplinary problem or a dip in grades, for example, help them write about what they learned or the wisdom that they have gained and that it won't happen again once the student steps on the college campus. That really is what the reader is looking for. They want to know is this a moment in time or a fundamental character flaw? They want to know what the student has done to rectify that situation. And they want to know, what has the history been since then?

8. Mock Interviews are Worthwhile. Sit down with students and go through a possible interview. How should they talk about their problems in person? When is it appropriate to bring it up? It takes the angst out of interviews to have practiced beforehand.

9. Help Students Move On. Advise students (and parents) not to obsess about the past. They need to know that that removes all forward momentum of the application. It stalls the application. Help them move on. Students get a sense of relief from doing that.

10. Keep It All in Perspective. Are students allowed to make mistakes anymore in selective college admissions? Unfortunately, in highly selective college admissions, one little thing could swing a kid off the table. That's the basic reality. And that is part of the consequences of the decisions these students make. But there are admissions committees who want to give students a chance, who went through the same kind of ordeal. These "late blooming boys" are going to get in somewhere. And they are going to do well. We have an opportunity to reduce the stress for them and help them find the right place to start again.

These comments are adapted from the NACAC presentation in Austin, Texas, in September.

[back to top]

P.S. People Were Talking About
A new book out by Richard Lerner called The Good Teen. He states that instead of defining teens in negative terms (they don't smoke, they don't drink, they don't get into trouble) define the good teen by stressing "5 C's" with teenagers: "competence" including social, vocational and health, "confidence," then "character," "connection" and "caring."

[back to top]

ENROLLMENT TRENDS
Some Hispanic Student Stats. According to the 43 institutions in the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU), Hispanic graduation has risen to 58 percent, yet only 12 percent earn a college degree. About half of all Hispanic students reside in California and Texas. The Commission for Texas Higher Education has launched a 15-year initiative to boost college graduation rates among Hispanic students. Texas students can consult www.collegefortexans.com.

Graduation Rates. While the college rankings remain controversial, there is a new emphasis on tracking the real outcome of colleges' education work, graduation rates. That was the focus of U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spelling's Commission on the Future of Higher Education.

One year later, The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that hundreds of colleges and universities now use standardized student achievement tests to measure student learning; and many colleges plan to post performance-related data on their web sites. This latter group includes the 400 members of the American Association of State Colleges and Universities and the 200-member National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.

Others also have taken up the call. For example, The Education Trust maintains a web site that lets students easily track graduation rates at various colleges. See: www.collegeresults.org.

Part-Time Disadvantage. A new study from the National Center for Education Statistics, "Part-Time Undergraduates in Postsecondary Education: 2003-4," found that 35 percent of undergrads that year were part-time students. The profile of these students indicates they are more likely to be older, female, Hispanic, first-generation and financially independent than full-time students. Most attend two-year colleges. Only 25 percent of full-time students attend two-year institutions. About 83 percent of the part-time students work full time.

The bad news was that when researchers examined a group of part-time undergrads who entered college in 1995, only 15 percent had earned a degree by the end of six years. About 46 percent of these students left school within their first year. In contrast, 64 percent of full-time students had earned a degree or certificate within six years, 44 percent earned their bachelor's degree. And 72 percent of the full-timers had stayed in school.

Minority College Student Enrollment. A new 149-page report from the National Center for Education Statistics called "Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Minorities" examines the state of minority students across the board from elementary school through postsecondary. Among the highlights:

  • Between 1976 and 2004, the percentage of minority students enrolled as undergraduates increased from 17 to 32 percent. But in 2004, the gender gap between females and males was largest for black undergraduates.
  • In 2003-04, Asians/Pacific Islanders received a smaller percentage of aid than any other race/ethnicity.
  • More postsecondary degrees were awarded to Blacks than Hispanics, although Hispanics comprised a larger percentage of the total population. Hispanics and American Indians/Alaska Natives received a higher proportion of associate's degrees. For details, see http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007039.pdf.

[back to top]

NEWS YOU CAN USE
Tuition Still Climbing. According to the College Board, the cost of college was up for 2006, but the rate of growth was lower over the past five years.

  • At public four-year institutions, in-state tuition and fees average $6,185, or $381 more than last year, a 6.6 percent increase. In 2007-08, average total charges (which include both room and board and tuition and fees), are $13,589, a 5.9 percent increase over last year. The average full-time student at a public four-year school receives about $3,600 in grants and tax benefits, which lowers the average tuition and fees to a net price of about $2,600.
  • At private four-year nonprofit institutions, tuition and fees average $23,712, or $1,404 more than last year, a 6.3 percent increase. Average total charges (including room and board and tuition and fees), are $32,307 in 2007-08, which is 5.9 percent higher than in 2006-07. The average full-time student attending a private college receives about $9,300 in grants and tax benefits, which reduces the average tuition and fees to a net price of about $14,400.
  • At public two-year institutions, tuition and fees average $2,361, a $95 or 4.2 percent increase. The average full-time student in this sector receives about $2,040 in grants and tax benefits, lowering the average tuition and fees to a net price of about $320.

The College Board released these and other higher education pricing and aid statistics in its annual "Trends in College Pricing 2007" and "Trends in Student Aid 2007" reports. For complete copies of these reports see www.collegeboard.org.

Out-of-Control? The Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics new report concludes: 54 percent of faculty members at 23 Division 1-A universities said that decisions about sports on their campus were driven by needs of the entertainment industry; 72 percent think the salaries paid to the football and basketball coaches are excessive; 46 percent are satisfied with their university president's oversight of athletics, while 28 percent are not; 61 percent said athletes were motivated to earn their degrees and keep pace with peers in the classroom.

Liberal Colleges? How liberal are today's college professors? That's what many students and parents want to know. For years, conservative critics have charged colleges with being havens for "leftist professors." Now two professors, from Harvard U. and George Mason U., conclude that nearly 44 percent of the 1,417 full-time professors they surveyed at 927 colleges of all types are "liberal." Just over 9 percent are "conservative." But 47 percent describe themselves as "moderates."

And, Lest You Wondered, Higher Education Pays. But it is not just in monetary gains from a college education, a new report from the College Board says. College also improves the quality of life for recipients and society in general. Among the benefits: College graduates are more likely to have access to pension plans and are more actively involved in improving their health. They also volunteer more, vote more often and are more likely to donate blood. For more info see www.collegeboard.org.

Final Chapters. The 129-year-old Sheldon Jackson C., the oldest college in Alaska, has suspended academic operations. According to the Southern Education Foundation's new report, "Education After Katrina: Time for a New Federal Response," about 35,000 students from Louisiana and Mississippi did not return to college or university in either their home state or elsewhere because of the disruptions of the hurricane.

[back to top]

 


COLLEGE BOUND's Publisher/Editor: R. Craig Sautter, DePaul University; Chief Operating Officer: Sally Reed; Assistant Editor: Emma Schwartz; Illustration: Louis Coronel; Board of Advisors: David Breeden, Edina High School, Minnesota; Claire D. Friedlander, Bedford (N.Y.) Central School District; Howard Greene and Matthew Greene, authors, The Greenes' Guides to Educational Planning Series; Frank C. Leana, Ph.D., educational counselor; M. Fredric Volkmann, Washington University in St. Louis; Mary Ann Willis, Bayside Academy (Daphne, Ala.).


 

 

In This Issue

Feature Articles
The News From
NACAC This Fall

The Federal Dollar

The Guide to the Guides

THE COUNSELOR'S
CORNER
Where Would Holden Caufield
Get In?

-P.S. People Were Talking About

ENROLLMENT TRENDS
-Some Hispanic Student Stats
-Graduation Rates
-Part-Time Disadvantage
-Minority College Student Enrollment

NEWS YOU CAN USE
-Tuition Still Climbing
-Out-of-Control?
-Liberal Colleges?
-And, Lest You Wondered,
Higher Education Pays

-Final Chapters

CB has learned it won an APEX 2007 Award of Excellence in the newsletter category "for excellence in publication" from Communication Concepts. Nearly 5,000 publications were evaluated. Thanks to our subscribers for your continued support.

DOWNLOAD PDF

P.S. To renew your subscription go to
Renew Subscription
or to order Who Got In? 2006 go to
Order Who Got In? 2006
or call 773-262-5810.

 

 


  Home | About Us | Subscribe/Renew | Contact Us | Current Issues | Back Issues | Visitors | Who Got In? | Links/Resources

Privacy Policy/Terms of Service

All Rights Reserved.
editor@collegeboundnews.com